A newsletter on the latest in AI for healthcare.

Welcome back,

I never thought I would see this coming, Vitestro’s Aletta received FDA De Novo authorisation for robotic blood draws (venipuncture) in outpatient settings. The robot still requires trained phlebotomy supervision, but moves AI and robotics closer to procedure execution.

At Mount Sinai, Sofiya a voice based LLM assistant, completed nearly 88% of routine pre-procedure cardiac catheterisation calls, showing how AI can handle some of the admin tasks, and perhaps do them to a very good standard.

Meanwhile, GatorOnco is a our top model of the day, it applies agentic LLM planning to colorectal cancer, though it remains research-stage.

Here is what you need to know today

SUMMARY

Top Research Paper

  • Mount Sinai tested a voice-based LLM assistant across 1,606 pre-procedure calls for cardiac catheterisation, with nurse review and escalation built into the workflow.

Top AI News

  • Vitestro’s Aletta creates a US route for supervised robotic blood draws: the FDA authorised Aletta through the De Novo pathway, establishing a new device category for autonomous robotic phlebotomy.

Top Model

  • GatorOnco is an agentic LLM system for colorectal cancer treatment planning that combines domain adaptation, reinforcement learning and guideline retrieval.

Bedside Bets

Startup rounds, deals, and moves.

Pulse Check

Quick reads across health AI.

TOP PAPER

📞 Sofiya (voice based LLM) handled 1,606 cath-lab prep calls, but nurses still owned the workflow

Source: npj Digital Medicine · July 2026

Mount Sinai tested Sofiya, a customised voice-based large language model assistant, in a real world setting of arranging elective cardiac catheterisation procedures.

Sofiya called patients before their procedure. It gave logistics and preparation instructions, collected clinical information, answered common questions and escalated cases to nurses when needed.

Research Question

  • Can a voice-based conversational AI assistant safely and reliably support pre-procedure patient preparation for cardiac catheterisation?

Image source

Approach

  • Prospective, two-phase implementation at Mount Sinai’s cardiac catheterisation laboratory.

  • Phase I: 90-day stabilisation period with clinicians and developers improving the workflow.

  • Phase II: 90-day real-world routine-use period led by nurses.

  • Sofiya called patients to provide instructions, collect allergy, medication and clinical-status information, answer questions and escalate when needed.

  • Every AI-generated report was reviewed by a registered nurse before it entered the electronic health record (EHR).

  • The main outcome was the share of calls that reached the end of the script, with all clinical questions answered.

Results

  • Phase I included 806 calls. 696 were completed, giving an 86.4% completion rate.

  • Phase II included 800 calls. 703 were completed, giving an 87.9% completion rate.

  • Fully automated calls increased from 295 in Phase I to 341 in Phase II.

  • Protocol-driven nurse callbacks fell from 303 in Phase I to 268 in Phase II.

  • AI system errors fell from 48 calls in Phase I to 24 calls in Phase II.

  • Hallucinations that caused incomplete calls occurred in 6 Phase I calls and 0 Phase II calls.

  • Sofiya-assisted preparation averaged 8.9 minutes, compared with a 20-minute manual baseline.

  • The authors estimated annual savings equivalent to 37.3 twelve-hour nursing shifts.

  • Patient satisfaction among surveyed patients was 94.7% in Phase I and 98.1% in Phase II.

Caveats

  • This was not autonomous clinical handoff. Nurses still reviewed calls and verified AI-generated reports.

  • Speech recognition remained vulnerable to background noise, accents, speaking style and vocabulary.

Potential impact

This is a strong example of near-term clinical AI deployment: automate repetitive patient-preparation work, keep human review in the loop and measure workflow reliability rather than model cleverness alone.

TOP NEWS

Aletta gives hospitals a procurement path for supervised robotic phlebotomy

Source: Vitestro / FDA · 19 to 20 August 2026

Vitestro says the FDA granted De Novo authorisation for Aletta, its Autonomous Robotic Phlebotomy Device. The FDA described Aletta as the first standalone robotic device authorised to draw blood from a patient’s arm without hands-on operator intervention.

This is still supervised care. The FDA says Aletta is authorised for adults in outpatient settings and must be operated under oversight from a supervisor trained in phlebotomy.

Image source

  • This is the first FDA-authorised standalone robotic blood-draw device; one trained phlebotomist can oversee up to three Aletta devices at the same time.

  • The Tech: The setup uses near-infrared light, Doppler ultrasound, robotics and AI used to identify suitable veins and guide the draw.

Why it matters: This is a sharper commercial story than another AI scribe or chatbot. Aletta moves AI into a physical, high-volume clinical workflow. For hospitals, labs and outpatient networks, although as a doctor I am thinking of the big question, what happens in patients with high unusual anatomy? Could the device cause harm by prodding for a vein that is difficult to find?

TOP AI MODEL

GatorOnco grounds colorectal cancer treatment planning in guidelines and could draft first-pass oncology plans

Source: GitHub / arXiv · August 2026

GatorOnco is an agentic large language model system for colorectal cancer treatment planning. It is designed as oncology decision-support research, not a general medical chatbot.

The system takes heterogeneous clinical context, retrieves relevant guideline information and generates treatment-plan recommendations. Its core claim is that agentic reasoning plus guideline retrieval can improve safety and completeness in a high-stakes oncology workflow.

What stands out

  • It was developed using 282 billion biomedical tokens, including 166 billion tokens of UF Health clinical text.

  • It combines domain adaptation, model merging, post-training and agent-based reinforcement learning.

  • It uses retrieval-augmented generation (RAG) to pull in time-sensitive clinical guideline material during inference.

  • The linked repository includes code for preprocessing notes, building datasets, constructing guideline-derived vector databases, running inference and evaluating outputs.

  • The repository reports a blinded evaluation on 79 real-world colorectal cancer cases reviewed by five board-certified oncologists.

  • The arXiv abstract reports expert-level parity on correctness, currency and safety, with higher scores for readability and completeness versus expert oncologists.

Caveat

Reproducibility also depends on access to local clinical data and guideline materials. I could not verify a public Hugging Face model card for GatorOnco from the linked repo or search results, so this should not be treated as a ready-to-download clinical model.

BEDSIDE BETS

Bedside Bets

Startup rounds, deals, and moves in healthcare AI.

Explore Education and Careers resources to build a career in healthcare AI/ML.

NEWSLETTER BY:
Dr Ezekiel Dinama

MD and PhD Researcher at Cambridge University applying physics-informed ML/AI to neurophysiological research.